【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿，这里小编给大家分享一些，方便大家学习。
阅读综合辅导 [历史学] 题目序号 题型归类 第1题 中心主旨题型 第2题 审题定位题型 第3题 审题定位题型 第4题 标点符号题型 第5题 写作手法题型 Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries andfocal points periods, countries, dramatic events, and great leaders. It also hashad clear and firm notions of scholarly procedure: how one inquires into ahistorical problem, how one presents and documents ones findings,what constitutes admissible and adequate proof. Anyone who has followed recent historical literature can testify tothe revolution that is taking place in historical studies. The currentlyfashionable subjects come directly from the sociology catalog: childhood, work,leisure. The new subjects are accompanied by new methods. Where history oncewas primarily narrative, it is now entirely analytic. The old questions Whathappened? and How did it happen? have given way to the question Why did it happen? Prominentamong the methods used to answer the question Why ispsychoanalysis, and its use has given rise to psychohistory. Psychohistory does not merely use psychological explanations inhistorical contexts. Historians have always used such explanations when theywere appropriate and when there was sufficient evidence for them. But thispragmatic use of psychology is not what psychohistorians intend. They arecommitted, not just to psychology in general, but to Freudian psychoanalysis.This commitment precludes a commitment to history as historians have alwaysunderstood it. Psychohistory derives its facts not fromhistory, the detailed records of events and their consequences, but frompsychoanalysis of the individuals who made history, and deduces its theoriesnot from this or that instance in their lives, but from a view of human naturethat transcends history. It denies the basic criterion of historical evidence:that evidence be publicly accessible to, and therefore assessable by, allhistorians. And it violates the basic tenet of historical method: thathistorians be alert to the negative instances that would refute their theses.Psychohistorians, convinced of the absolute rightness of their own theories, arealso convinced that theirs is the deepest explanationof any event, that other explanations fall short of the truth. Psychohistory is not content to violate the discipline of history; italso violates the past itself. It denies to the past an integrity and will ofits own, in which people acted out of a variety of motives and in which eventshad a multiplicity of causes and effects. It imposes upon the past the samedeterminism that it imposes upon the present, thus robbing people and events oftheir individuality and of their complexity. Instead of respecting theparticularity of the past, it assimilates all events, past and present, into asingle deterministic schema that is presumed to be true at all times and in allcircumstances. 1.Which of the following best states the main point of the text? [A] The approach of psychohistorians to historical study is currently in vogueeven though it lacks the rigor and verifiability of traditional historicalmethod. [B] Traditional historians can benefit from studying the techniques andfindings of psychohistorians. [C] Areas of sociological study such as childhood and work are of littleinterest to traditional historians. [D] The psychological assessment of an individuals behavior andattitudes is more informative than the details of his or her daily life. 2.The author mentions which of the following as a characteristic of thepractice of psychohistorians? [A] The lives of historical figures are presented in episodic rather thannarrative form. [B] Archives used by psychohistorians to gather material are not accessible toother scholars. [C] Past and current events are all placed within the same deterministicdiagram. [D] Events in the adult life of a historical figure are seen to be moreconsequential than are those in the childhood of the figure. 3.The author of the text suggests that psychohistorians view history primarilyas [A] a report of events, causes, and effects that is generally accepted byhistorians but which is, for the most part, unverifiable. [B] an episodic account that lacks cohesion because records of the role ofchildhood, work, and leisure in the lives of historical figures are rare. [C] an uncharted sea of seemingly unexplainable events that have meaning onlywhen examined as discrete units. [D] a record the way in which a closed set of immutable psychological lawsseems to have shaped events. 4.The author of the text puts the word deepest in quotation marks most probably in order to [A] signal her reservations about the accuracy of psychohistorians claims fortheir work. [B] draw attention to a contradiction in the psychohistorians method. [C] emphasize the major difference between the traditional historians method andthat of psychohistorians. [D] disassociate her opinion of the psychohistorians claims fromher opinion of their method. 5.In presenting her analysis, the author does all of the following EXCEPT. [A] Make general statements without reference to specific examples. [B] Describe some of the criteria employed by traditional historians. [C] Question the adequacy of the psychohistorians interpretation ofevents. [D] Point out inconsistencies in the psychohistorians applicationof their methods. [答案与考点解析] 1.【答案】A 【考点解析】这是一道中心主旨题。从第二段开始出现全文的主要谈论内容，第二段的最后一句出现了全文所谈论的中心psychohistory，在第二段中谈到了psychohistory的流行性，在第二段和第三段中作者谈到了psychohistory缺乏历史科学研究的严密性和可考证性。由此分析可见本题的正确选项应该是包含psychohistory和history概念的选项A。考生在解题时要善于首先捕捉全文的中心主旨句，并通过阅读和理解去把握原文所表达的思想。 2.【答案】C 【考点解析】这是一道审题定位题。通过题干中的psychohistorians可将本题的答案信息确定在第三、四段，但是题干并没有明确指出本题准确的信息来源。但是题干中的practice（实践）一词暗示考生本题的答案信息可能在尾段，因为人们一般阐述问题的规律是：从理论谈到实践。如果不出万一本文的尾段应该谈到psychohistorians的实践问题。通过阅读尾段，尤其是尾段尾句，我们可得出本题的正确选项应该是C。这道题的难点在于审题定位。审题定位不是一个简单的问题，需要考生对文章的叙述结构和人类的表达习惯有所认识。 3.【答案】D 【考点解析】这是一道审题定位题。通过题干中的psychohistorians view history primarily as可判断本题是要考生找出psychohistorians如何看待（viewas）历史（history），即要考生找出psychohistorians对历史的看法和态度。根据行文和表达规律，这道题的答案信息应该在第三段，准确地说在第三段的第五句话，因为这句话包含history一词。通过阅读和理解第三段的第四、五、六句话，我们可以推导出本题的正确选项应该是突出psychological含义的选项D。考生在解题时一定要注意英语行文和表达的规则。 4.【答案】A 【考点解析】这是一道标点符号题。本题题干已将本题的答案信息确定在第三段的倒数第二行。此处引号所表达的含义是所谓最深刻的，即实际上是不深刻的。故本题的正确选项应该是含有reservations（有保留）一词的选项A。考生在破解阅读理解题型时一定要注意标点符号的应用，以及它们所产生的相应的含义。 5.【答案】D 【考点解析】本题是一道写作手法题型。这是一道比较难的题，旨在考察考生的语言基本功，尤其是写作手法和文章结构方面的知识。本题A、B、C中所涉及的内容可分别在第三段第六、七、八句、第一段第一、二句以及第三段的尾句找到。本文并没有谈到psychohistorians在应用自己方法方面的前后矛盾不一致性，故本题的正确选项应该是选项D。考生在解题时应注意原文中常用的写作手法。 [参考译文] 传统上，历史研究具有固定的界限和焦点时期、国家、引人注目的事件，和伟大的领袖。在学术过程上的观念也非常清晰和坚定：研究者是如何探究历史问题的，他们是如何展示他们的发现并归纳成文档的，有什么令人信服的足够的证据。 凡是注意最近的历史文献的人都能证明在历史研究上正在发生一场革命。目前最流行的题材直接来源于社会学领域：儿童时代，工作，休闲。伴随着新的题材的是新的研究方法。过去的历史主要是叙述性的，现在则完全变成分析性的了。过去的问题是发生了什么？和怎么发生的？，现在它们则让位给了为什么会发生？。在用来回答为什么这一问题的方法中，最突出的是心理分析，而对这种方法的使用则导致了心理历史学的兴起。 心理历史学并不仅仅在历史环境下使用心理解释。过去，历史学家也总是在适当并有足够证据支持的时候使用这样的解释。但这种对心理学的实用主义的应用并不是心理历史学家所希望的。他们通常不只局限于心理学，而是要使用弗洛伊德的心理分析。这样，就同过去历史学家所理解的历史大相径庭了。心理历史学不是从历史，从事件的详细记录和它们的前因后果中来获取事实，而是对造成历史的个人进行心理分析，从中获取事实；不是从这些创造历史的人物一生的这个或那个实例中演绎出理论，而是从超越历史的人类本性的角度来推导理论。它否定关于历史证据的基本标准，即：这些证据应该是公众能够了解的，因此，也就是所有历史学家都能够了解的。它还违反了历史学方法的基本原则：历史学家要警惕能够驳倒他们的论题的反面事例。心理历史学家，则相信他们的理论绝对正确，而且确信他们的理论是对任何事件的最深刻的解释，而其它的解释都远离真实。 心理历史学家并不满足于破坏历史学的规范（在正确研究和书写过去的意义上）；它还要破坏过去本身。它否定过去是一个整体并有自身的发展规律，人们在这个整体中出于各种不同的动机行事，事件的发生是由多种原因和影响共同造成的。它把决定当前情况的决定论强加给过去，这就剥夺了人和事件的独特性和复杂性。它不是尊重过去的特殊性，而是把过去和现在的所有事件都吸收到一个单一的决定论模式中，假设这个模式在任意时间和任意环境中都是正确的。
阅读综合辅导 [历史学] 题目序号 题型归类 第1题 中心主旨题型 第2题 审题定位题型 第3题 审题定位题型 第4题 标点符号题型 第5题 写作手法题型 Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries andfocal points periods, countries, dramatic events, and great leaders. It also hashad clear and firm notions of scholarly procedure: how one inquires into ahistorical problem, how one presents and documents ones findings,what constitutes admissible and adequate proof. Anyone who has followed recent historical literature can testify tothe revolution that is taking place in historical studies. The currentlyfashionable subjects come directly from the sociology catalog: childhood, work,leisure. The new subjects are accompanied by new methods. Where history oncewas primarily narrative, it is now entirely analytic. The old questions Whathappened? and How did it happen? have given way to the question Why did it happen? Prominentamong the methods used to answer the question Why ispsychoanalysis, and its use has given rise to psychohistory. Psychohistory does not merely use psychological explanations inhistorical contexts. Historians have always used such explanations when theywere appropriate and when there was sufficient evidence for them. But thispragmatic use of psychology is not what psychohistorians intend. They arecommitted, not just to psychology in general, but to Freudian psychoanalysis.This commitment precludes a commitment to history as historians have alwaysunderstood it. Psychohistory derives its facts not fromhistory, the detailed records of events and their consequences, but frompsychoanalysis of the individuals who made history, and deduces its theoriesnot from this or that instance in their lives, but from a view of human naturethat transcends history. It denies the basic criterion of historical evidence:that evidence be publicly accessible to, and therefore assessable by, allhistorians. And it violates the basic tenet of historical method: thathistorians be alert to the negative instances that would refute their theses.Psychohistorians, convinced of the absolute rightness of their own theories, arealso convinced that theirs is the deepest explanationof any event, that other explanations fall short of the truth. Psychohistory is not content to violate the discipline of history; italso violates the past itself. It denies to the past an integrity and will ofits own, in which people acted out of a variety of motives and in which eventshad a multiplicity of causes and effects. It imposes upon the past the samedeterminism that it imposes upon the present, thus robbing people and events oftheir individuality and of their complexity. Instead of respecting theparticularity of the past, it assimilates all events, past and present, into asingle deterministic schema that is presumed to be true at all times and in allcircumstances. 1.Which of the following best states the main point of the text? [A] The approach of psychohistorians to historical study is currently in vogueeven though it lacks the rigor and verifiability of traditional historicalmethod. [B] Traditional historians can benefit from studying the techniques andfindings of psychohistorians. [C] Areas of sociological study such as childhood and work are of littleinterest to traditional historians. [D] The psychological assessment of an individuals behavior andattitudes is more informative than the details of his or her daily life. 2.The author mentions which of the following as a characteristic of thepractice of psychohistorians? [A] The lives of historical figures are presented in episodic rather thannarrative form. [B] Archives used by psychohistorians to gather material are not accessible toother scholars. [C] Past and current events are all placed within the same deterministicdiagram. [D] Events in the adult life of a historical figure are seen to be moreconsequential than are those in the childhood of the figure. 3.The author of the text suggests that psychohistorians view history primarilyas [A] a report of events, causes, and effects that is generally accepted byhistorians but which is, for the most part, unverifiable. [B] an episodic account that lacks cohesion because records of the role ofchildhood, work, and leisure in the lives of historical figures are rare. [C] an uncharted sea of seemingly unexplainable events that have meaning onlywhen examined as discrete units. [D] a record the way in which a closed set of immutable psychological lawsseems to have shaped events. 4.The author of the text puts the word deepest in quotation marks most probably in order to [A] signal her reservations about the accuracy of psychohistorians claims fortheir work. [B] draw attention to a contradiction in the psychohistorians method. [C] emphasize the major difference between the traditional historians method andthat of psychohistorians. [D] disassociate her opinion of the psychohistorians claims fromher opinion of their method. 5.In presenting her analysis, the author does all of the following EXCEPT. [A] Make general statements without reference to specific examples. [B] Describe some of the criteria employed by traditional historians. [C] Question the adequacy of the psychohistorians interpretation ofevents. [D] Point out inconsistencies in the psychohistorians applicationof their methods. [答案与考点解析] 1.【答案】A 【考点解析】这是一道中心主旨题。从第二段开始出现全文的主要谈论内容，第二段的最后一句出现了全文所谈论的中心psychohistory，在第二段中谈到了psychohistory的流行性，在第二段和第三段中作者谈到了psychohistory缺乏历史科学研究的严密性和可考证性。由此分析可见本题的正确选项应该是包含psychohistory和history概念的选项A。考生在解题时要善于首先捕捉全文的中心主旨句，并通过阅读和理解去把握原文所表达的思想。 2.【答案】C 【考点解析】这是一道审题定位题。通过题干中的psychohistorians可将本题的答案信息确定在第三、四段，但是题干并没有明确指出本题准确的信息来源。但是题干中的practice（实践）一词暗示考生本题的答案信息可能在尾段，因为人们一般阐述问题的规律是：从理论谈到实践。如果不出万一本文的尾段应该谈到psychohistorians的实践问题。通过阅读尾段，尤其是尾段尾句，我们可得出本题的正确选项应该是C。这道题的难点在于审题定位。审题定位不是一个简单的问题，需要考生对文章的叙述结构和人类的表达习惯有所认识。 3.【答案】D 【考点解析】这是一道审题定位题。通过题干中的psychohistorians view history primarily as可判断本题是要考生找出psychohistorians如何看待（viewas）历史（history），即要考生找出psychohistorians对历史的看法和态度。根据行文和表达规律，这道题的答案信息应该在第三段，准确地说在第三段的第五句话，因为这句话包含history一词。通过阅读和理解第三段的第四、五、六句话，我们可以推导出本题的正确选项应该是突出psychological含义的选项D。考生在解题时一定要注意英语行文和表达的规则。 4.【答案】A 【考点解析】这是一道标点符号题。本题题干已将本题的答案信息确定在第三段的倒数第二行。此处引号所表达的含义是所谓最深刻的，即实际上是不深刻的。故本题的正确选项应该是含有reservations（有保留）一词的选项A。考生在破解阅读理解题型时一定要注意标点符号的应用，以及它们所产生的相应的含义。 5.【答案】D 【考点解析】本题是一道写作手法题型。这是一道比较难的题，旨在考察考生的语言基本功，尤其是写作手法和文章结构方面的知识。本题A、B、C中所涉及的内容可分别在第三段第六、七、八句、第一段第一、二句以及第三段的尾句找到。本文并没有谈到psychohistorians在应用自己方法方面的前后矛盾不一致性，故本题的正确选项应该是选项D。考生在解题时应注意原文中常用的写作手法。 [参考译文] 传统上，历史研究具有固定的界限和焦点时期、国家、引人注目的事件，和伟大的领袖。在学术过程上的观念也非常清晰和坚定：研究者是如何探究历史问题的，他们是如何展示他们的发现并归纳成文档的，有什么令人信服的足够的证据。 凡是注意最近的历史文献的人都能证明在历史研究上正在发生一场革命。目前最流行的题材直接来源于社会学领域：儿童时代，工作，休闲。伴随着新的题材的是新的研究方法。过去的历史主要是叙述性的，现在则完全变成分析性的了。过去的问题是发生了什么？和怎么发生的？，现在它们则让位给了为什么会发生？。在用来回答为什么这一问题的方法中，最突出的是心理分析，而对这种方法的使用则导致了心理历史学的兴起。 心理历史学并不仅仅在历史环境下使用心理解释。过去，历史学家也总是在适当并有足够证据支持的时候使用这样的解释。但这种对心理学的实用主义的应用并不是心理历史学家所希望的。他们通常不只局限于心理学，而是要使用弗洛伊德的心理分析。这样，就同过去历史学家所理解的历史大相径庭了。心理历史学不是从历史，从事件的详细记录和它们的前因后果中来获取事实，而是对造成历史的个人进行心理分析，从中获取事实；不是从这些创造历史的人物一生的这个或那个实例中演绎出理论，而是从超越历史的人类本性的角度来推导理论。它否定关于历史证据的基本标准，即：这些证据应该是公众能够了解的，因此，也就是所有历史学家都能够了解的。它还违反了历史学方法的基本原则：历史学家要警惕能够驳倒他们的论题的反面事例。心理历史学家，则相信他们的理论绝对正确，而且确信他们的理论是对任何事件的最深刻的解释，而其它的解释都远离真实。 心理历史学家并不满足于破坏历史学的规范（在正确研究和书写过去的意义上）；它还要破坏过去本身。它否定过去是一个整体并有自身的发展规律，人们在这个整体中出于各种不同的动机行事，事件的发生是由多种原因和影响共同造成的。它把决定当前情况的决定论强加给过去，这就剥夺了人和事件的独特性和复杂性。它不是尊重过去的特殊性，而是把过去和现在的所有事件都吸收到一个单一的决定论模式中，假设这个模式在任意时间和任意环境中都是正确的。
