【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿，这里小编给大家分享一些，方便大家学习。
China abroad 中国的海外投资
IN EUROPE, the red carpet. In America, a red mist.This weeks tour of European capitals by Wen Jiabao,Chinas prime minister, underlined the starktransatlantic difference in responses to Chinas economic clout. European leaders, caught up inthe euro areas crisis, want China to buy more of their debt; American politicians worry that itowns too much of theirs. For European politicians the value of the yuan is one worry amongmany; it sometimes feels like Americans can think of little else. In Europe, Chinese firms arebroadly welcome; in America, they are often viewed with suspicion.
在欧洲，是红地毯，在美国，是蒙蒙的红雾。中国国务院总理温家宝在这周的欧洲首都之行上，凸显了大西洋彼岸的国家对中国经济实力增强的不同反应。欧洲各国的领导人，被欧元区危机弄得焦头烂额，迫切希望中国购买他们的债券，美国的政客则担心中国蚕食他们的利益;对于欧洲的政客，人民币的价值只是他们担心的一个方面，而在美国却盯着此不放;在欧洲，中国的公司受到广泛的欢迎，在美国，他们却经常被视作动机不纯。
Europes receptiveness to China is born partly of weakness. Delegations from peripheraleuro-zone countries have been flying into Beijing to seek buyers of their debt. Fixers workingfor Chinese companies report a steady stream of inquiries from cash-strapped European firms.But even among Europes stronger economies, the political bias is to promote investment fromChina, not deter it.
欧洲对中国的接纳部分是因为欧洲经济的疲软。欧元区的小国代表团已经飞往北京去寻找债券购买人了，为中国公司工作的调停者已经从那些现金流不足的欧洲公司那里整理出一份详细的咨询报告。甚至是那些强大的经济体，政治的偏见都没能够抑制从中国来的投资。
That stance will have big consequences. Chinasforeign direct investment to date has focused onsecuring the energy and resources that itsindustrialising economy craves. Chinese money hasbeen visible in Asia, Africa and Latin America, buyingup everything from copper mines in Peru andfarmland in Tanzania to aluminium smelters inAustralia. But the next stage in Chinas emergenceis under way and it will centre on Europe.
这种立场将会产生巨大的影响。中国至今的对外直接投资都是集中在牢牢把握能源资源方面，那些可以满足工业化经济的资源。中国的投资可以在亚洲，非洲，拉丁美洲都可被看到，从秘鲁的铜矿，坦桑尼亚的农田到澳大利亚的铝矿熔炉，他们统统全部买下。中国下一阶段的计划显然就是当下正在做的并把中心移至欧洲。
To understand why, consider each of the worlds three largest economic powers in turn. Chinawants to climb the development ladder. Its burgeoning domestic markets are fiercelycontested, so its firms want new sources of advantage like Western brands and marketingexpertise. Its export-oriented firms want to lock in closer ties with end-customers.
想知道为什么吗?以此考虑一下世界三个大经济体的力量吧。中国想要搭上这次发展的快车。它自己国内快速发展的市场竞争激烈，所以中国的公司想要一些新的优势资源，比如像欧洲的品牌和市场经验，出口导向的公司希望和终端消费者靠的更近一些。
America is the natural place for China to turn to but the economic relationship between thesuperpower and the dragon breathing down its neck is fraught. Ever since CNOOC, a state-controlled Chinese oil firm, was forced out of the bidding for Californias Unocal in 2005 bycongressional and media critics, many big Chinese companies have regarded America asfundamentally hostile to their investments.
美国最自然是中国企业转移的最佳地方，但是这个超级大国和他鼻子下呼吸的中国龙的经济关系并不是那么的令人愉快。自从2005年中海油中国国有控制的石油公司被国会和媒体批评家从加州优尼科公司的竞价中强制哄走后，好多中国公司都认为美国对他们投资存在根本敌意。
This perception is not entirely fair. The process for screening inward investments into Americaon security grounds does not appear to discriminate against China. But Chinese companieswanting to buy American assets must be prepared to risk public attacks by wealthy lobbygroups and frothing congressmen. Many choose to avoid America instead. A report by the AsiaSociety in Washington, DC, says that scaremongering about China could lead America to forfeita share of $1 trillion-worth of outward Chinese direct investment by 2023.
这种认识并不是公平的。对进入美国的对内投资进行程序的审查并不能表示是对中国的歧视。中国公司想要购买美国资产必须做好应对来自富人游说团体和国会议员攻击的风险。但是很多都选择避开美国。一份来自华盛顿的亚洲社会显示，到2023年，对中国散布的谣言将会是使美国丧失一份价值1万亿美元的中国直接对外投资。
More of that cash is instead heading to Europe. Investment bankers there are now sure to dialChinese clients if they hear that a firm is a possible bid target. Chinese banks are rapidlyincreasing their presence in Europe. Mainlanders are snapping up central London residences.Chinese direct investment abroad has increased faster in Europe than in any other region.
更甚的是，现金转而都流向了欧洲，现在，投资银行听到一公司可能会有竞标的投资目标，就一定会给中国的客户打电话咨询。中国的银行在欧洲出现的次数也快速的增多起来。中国人正在抢购伦敦市中心的豪宅。中国在欧洲的直接投资增长速度超过了其他任何地方。
The Europeans get more than just money. A Chinesepartner is a good way for a European brand to gainaccess to the worlds soon-to-be-biggest economy.Ask Frances Club Med, which now has a big Chineseshareholder and recently opened its first holidayresort in the country. Or CIFA, an Italianconstruction-equipment maker whose products arenow marketed as a premium brand by its Chineseowner. Or Swedens Volvo, which was bought byGeely, a Chinese carmaker, in 2010 and now callsChina its second home market.
欧洲得到的不仅仅是金钱。一个中国搭档就是一条可以使欧洲品牌通往世界快速增长经济体的捷径。问一下法国麦德俱乐部，现在有一个中国大股东，最近在中国建立了他的第一个度假村。还有CIFA，一家意大利施工设备制造厂，现在在中国新东家的管理下，他的产品已经成为市场上的顶级品牌。还有瑞典的沃尔沃，已经被一家中国汽车制造商吉利在2010购买，现在称中国为第二本土市场。
European voters are less happy about all this than their leaders: polls show that they viewChinese investments nearly as negatively as Americans do. Three worries predominate. Thefirst is that China will strip Europe of technology and jobs. It is true that Chinese firms areoften interested in buying European companies to use their know-how in China . But Chinese firms want to conquer markets abroad as well as at home, and to do thatin Europe, they must create jobs there. The second fear is that the Chinese are buyingEuropean jewels on the cheap. But theres no evidence for that. Indeed, they are more likely tooverpay: countries and firms with excess savings nearly always do. The third concern is thatinvestments in assets like utilities and mobile technology threaten Europes security. Butprocesses exist to screen foreign investments on those grounds. Theres no reason to thinkthat they are wanting, and no reason to tighten them until that changes.
欧洲的选民可不像他们的领导那么开心：民意调查显示他们对中国投资看法几乎和美国人差不多消极。有三个明显的担心。第一就是中国夺走了欧洲的技术和工作。中国企业购买欧洲公司并利用欧洲的技术在中国生产，他们经常只对此感兴趣这是真的。但是中国企业想要像在国内一样在欧洲征服海外市场。他们必须在那里创造就业岗位。第二个担心就是中国人低阶购买欧洲珠宝，但是这还没有什么证据证明。事实上，他们更喜欢高价购买：那些有着过多存款国家和企业经常如此做。第三个就是对公用工程和交通技术的投资会威胁到欧洲的安全。但是在这方面现有对国外投资的审查程序。现在没有理由认为那就是他们要的，也没有理由在那改变之前来缚束他们。
Chinas outward march certainly argues for vigilance, for it is the consequence of a huge shiftin the balance of power, and change always involves risk. But the opportunities are greater thanthe dangers. In welcoming China, Europe is swimming with the tide of history; America isstruggling against it.
中国的对外投资大军当然是谨慎的辩解，因为这对力量平衡的巨大转移有着重大意义，并且改变经常伴随着风险。但是机遇是大于风险的。在对中国的欢迎中，欧洲顺应了历史的潮流，而美国正在极力的反对这种趋势。
China abroad 中国的海外投资
IN EUROPE, the red carpet. In America, a red mist.This weeks tour of European capitals by Wen Jiabao,Chinas prime minister, underlined the starktransatlantic difference in responses to Chinas economic clout. European leaders, caught up inthe euro areas crisis, want China to buy more of their debt; American politicians worry that itowns too much of theirs. For European politicians the value of the yuan is one worry amongmany; it sometimes feels like Americans can think of little else. In Europe, Chinese firms arebroadly welcome; in America, they are often viewed with suspicion.
在欧洲，是红地毯，在美国，是蒙蒙的红雾。中国国务院总理温家宝在这周的欧洲首都之行上，凸显了大西洋彼岸的国家对中国经济实力增强的不同反应。欧洲各国的领导人，被欧元区危机弄得焦头烂额，迫切希望中国购买他们的债券，美国的政客则担心中国蚕食他们的利益;对于欧洲的政客，人民币的价值只是他们担心的一个方面，而在美国却盯着此不放;在欧洲，中国的公司受到广泛的欢迎，在美国，他们却经常被视作动机不纯。
Europes receptiveness to China is born partly of weakness. Delegations from peripheraleuro-zone countries have been flying into Beijing to seek buyers of their debt. Fixers workingfor Chinese companies report a steady stream of inquiries from cash-strapped European firms.But even among Europes stronger economies, the political bias is to promote investment fromChina, not deter it.
欧洲对中国的接纳部分是因为欧洲经济的疲软。欧元区的小国代表团已经飞往北京去寻找债券购买人了，为中国公司工作的调停者已经从那些现金流不足的欧洲公司那里整理出一份详细的咨询报告。甚至是那些强大的经济体，政治的偏见都没能够抑制从中国来的投资。
That stance will have big consequences. Chinasforeign direct investment to date has focused onsecuring the energy and resources that itsindustrialising economy craves. Chinese money hasbeen visible in Asia, Africa and Latin America, buyingup everything from copper mines in Peru andfarmland in Tanzania to aluminium smelters inAustralia. But the next stage in Chinas emergenceis under way and it will centre on Europe.
这种立场将会产生巨大的影响。中国至今的对外直接投资都是集中在牢牢把握能源资源方面，那些可以满足工业化经济的资源。中国的投资可以在亚洲，非洲，拉丁美洲都可被看到，从秘鲁的铜矿，坦桑尼亚的农田到澳大利亚的铝矿熔炉，他们统统全部买下。中国下一阶段的计划显然就是当下正在做的并把中心移至欧洲。
To understand why, consider each of the worlds three largest economic powers in turn. Chinawants to climb the development ladder. Its burgeoning domestic markets are fiercelycontested, so its firms want new sources of advantage like Western brands and marketingexpertise. Its export-oriented firms want to lock in closer ties with end-customers.
想知道为什么吗?以此考虑一下世界三个大经济体的力量吧。中国想要搭上这次发展的快车。它自己国内快速发展的市场竞争激烈，所以中国的公司想要一些新的优势资源，比如像欧洲的品牌和市场经验，出口导向的公司希望和终端消费者靠的更近一些。
America is the natural place for China to turn to but the economic relationship between thesuperpower and the dragon breathing down its neck is fraught. Ever since CNOOC, a state-controlled Chinese oil firm, was forced out of the bidding for Californias Unocal in 2005 bycongressional and media critics, many big Chinese companies have regarded America asfundamentally hostile to their investments.
美国最自然是中国企业转移的最佳地方，但是这个超级大国和他鼻子下呼吸的中国龙的经济关系并不是那么的令人愉快。自从2005年中海油中国国有控制的石油公司被国会和媒体批评家从加州优尼科公司的竞价中强制哄走后，好多中国公司都认为美国对他们投资存在根本敌意。
This perception is not entirely fair. The process for screening inward investments into Americaon security grounds does not appear to discriminate against China. But Chinese companieswanting to buy American assets must be prepared to risk public attacks by wealthy lobbygroups and frothing congressmen. Many choose to avoid America instead. A report by the AsiaSociety in Washington, DC, says that scaremongering about China could lead America to forfeita share of $1 trillion-worth of outward Chinese direct investment by 2023.
这种认识并不是公平的。对进入美国的对内投资进行程序的审查并不能表示是对中国的歧视。中国公司想要购买美国资产必须做好应对来自富人游说团体和国会议员攻击的风险。但是很多都选择避开美国。一份来自华盛顿的亚洲社会显示，到2023年，对中国散布的谣言将会是使美国丧失一份价值1万亿美元的中国直接对外投资。
More of that cash is instead heading to Europe. Investment bankers there are now sure to dialChinese clients if they hear that a firm is a possible bid target. Chinese banks are rapidlyincreasing their presence in Europe. Mainlanders are snapping up central London residences.Chinese direct investment abroad has increased faster in Europe than in any other region.
更甚的是，现金转而都流向了欧洲，现在，投资银行听到一公司可能会有竞标的投资目标，就一定会给中国的客户打电话咨询。中国的银行在欧洲出现的次数也快速的增多起来。中国人正在抢购伦敦市中心的豪宅。中国在欧洲的直接投资增长速度超过了其他任何地方。
The Europeans get more than just money. A Chinesepartner is a good way for a European brand to gainaccess to the worlds soon-to-be-biggest economy.Ask Frances Club Med, which now has a big Chineseshareholder and recently opened its first holidayresort in the country. Or CIFA, an Italianconstruction-equipment maker whose products arenow marketed as a premium brand by its Chineseowner. Or Swedens Volvo, which was bought byGeely, a Chinese carmaker, in 2010 and now callsChina its second home market.
欧洲得到的不仅仅是金钱。一个中国搭档就是一条可以使欧洲品牌通往世界快速增长经济体的捷径。问一下法国麦德俱乐部，现在有一个中国大股东，最近在中国建立了他的第一个度假村。还有CIFA，一家意大利施工设备制造厂，现在在中国新东家的管理下，他的产品已经成为市场上的顶级品牌。还有瑞典的沃尔沃，已经被一家中国汽车制造商吉利在2010购买，现在称中国为第二本土市场。
European voters are less happy about all this than their leaders: polls show that they viewChinese investments nearly as negatively as Americans do. Three worries predominate. Thefirst is that China will strip Europe of technology and jobs. It is true that Chinese firms areoften interested in buying European companies to use their know-how in China . But Chinese firms want to conquer markets abroad as well as at home, and to do thatin Europe, they must create jobs there. The second fear is that the Chinese are buyingEuropean jewels on the cheap. But theres no evidence for that. Indeed, they are more likely tooverpay: countries and firms with excess savings nearly always do. The third concern is thatinvestments in assets like utilities and mobile technology threaten Europes security. Butprocesses exist to screen foreign investments on those grounds. Theres no reason to thinkthat they are wanting, and no reason to tighten them until that changes.
欧洲的选民可不像他们的领导那么开心：民意调查显示他们对中国投资看法几乎和美国人差不多消极。有三个明显的担心。第一就是中国夺走了欧洲的技术和工作。中国企业购买欧洲公司并利用欧洲的技术在中国生产，他们经常只对此感兴趣这是真的。但是中国企业想要像在国内一样在欧洲征服海外市场。他们必须在那里创造就业岗位。第二个担心就是中国人低阶购买欧洲珠宝，但是这还没有什么证据证明。事实上，他们更喜欢高价购买：那些有着过多存款国家和企业经常如此做。第三个就是对公用工程和交通技术的投资会威胁到欧洲的安全。但是在这方面现有对国外投资的审查程序。现在没有理由认为那就是他们要的，也没有理由在那改变之前来缚束他们。
Chinas outward march certainly argues for vigilance, for it is the consequence of a huge shiftin the balance of power, and change always involves risk. But the opportunities are greater thanthe dangers. In welcoming China, Europe is swimming with the tide of history; America isstruggling against it.
中国的对外投资大军当然是谨慎的辩解，因为这对力量平衡的巨大转移有着重大意义，并且改变经常伴随着风险。但是机遇是大于风险的。在对中国的欢迎中，欧洲顺应了历史的潮流，而美国正在极力的反对这种趋势。
