首页 > 学习园地 > 英语学习

英语四级考试阅读简答题练习2

雕龙文库

【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿,这里小编给大家分享一些,方便大家学习。

  Would-be language teachers everywhere have one thing in common: they all want some recognition of their professional status and skills, and a job. The former requirement is obviously important on a personal level, but it is vital if you are to have any chance of finding work.

  Ten years ago, the situation was very different. In virtually every developing country, and in many developed countries as well, being a native English speaker was enough to get you employed as an English teacher.

  Now employers will only look at teachers who have the knowledge, the skills and attitudes to teach English effectively. The result of this has been to raise non-native English teachers to the same status as their native counterparts something they have always deserved but seldom enjoyed. Non-natives are now happylinguistic discrimination is a thing of the past.

  An ongoing research project, funded by the University of Cambridge, asked a sample of teachers, teacher educators and employers in more than 40 countries whether they regard the native/non-native speakers distinction as being at all important. NO was the answer. As long as candidates could teach and had the required level of English, it didnt matter who they were and where they came from. Thus, a new form of discriminationthis time justified because it singled out the unqualifiedliberated the linguistically oppressed . But the Cambridge project did more than just that: it confirmed that the needs of native and non-native teachers are extremely similar.

  Questions:

  S1. The selection of English teachers used to be mainly based on ________.

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  S2. What did non-native English teachers deserve but seldom enjoy?

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  S3. What kind of people can now find a job as an English teacher?

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  S4. What is the result of the new form of discrimination ?

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  S5. The phrase the linguistically oppressed refers to those who were _______.

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  Unit 2

  S1. whether or not one was a native speaker.

  S2. The same status as their counterparts.

  S3. Ones who can teach and have the required English level.

  S4. Non-native English teachers have been liberated. Or: It singled out the unqualified.

  S5. qualified English teachers because they were non-native speakers.

  

  Would-be language teachers everywhere have one thing in common: they all want some recognition of their professional status and skills, and a job. The former requirement is obviously important on a personal level, but it is vital if you are to have any chance of finding work.

  Ten years ago, the situation was very different. In virtually every developing country, and in many developed countries as well, being a native English speaker was enough to get you employed as an English teacher.

  Now employers will only look at teachers who have the knowledge, the skills and attitudes to teach English effectively. The result of this has been to raise non-native English teachers to the same status as their native counterparts something they have always deserved but seldom enjoyed. Non-natives are now happylinguistic discrimination is a thing of the past.

  An ongoing research project, funded by the University of Cambridge, asked a sample of teachers, teacher educators and employers in more than 40 countries whether they regard the native/non-native speakers distinction as being at all important. NO was the answer. As long as candidates could teach and had the required level of English, it didnt matter who they were and where they came from. Thus, a new form of discriminationthis time justified because it singled out the unqualifiedliberated the linguistically oppressed . But the Cambridge project did more than just that: it confirmed that the needs of native and non-native teachers are extremely similar.

  Questions:

  S1. The selection of English teachers used to be mainly based on ________.

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  S2. What did non-native English teachers deserve but seldom enjoy?

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  S3. What kind of people can now find a job as an English teacher?

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  S4. What is the result of the new form of discrimination ?

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  S5. The phrase the linguistically oppressed refers to those who were _______.

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  ______________ ______________ _______________ ______________ _____________

  Unit 2

  S1. whether or not one was a native speaker.

  S2. The same status as their counterparts.

  S3. Ones who can teach and have the required English level.

  S4. Non-native English teachers have been liberated. Or: It singled out the unqualified.

  S5. qualified English teachers because they were non-native speakers.

  

相关图文

推荐文章

网站地图:栏目 TAGS 范文 作文 文案 学科 百科

阅读并接受《用户协议》
注:各登录账户无关联!请仅用一种方式登录。


用户注册协议

一、 本网站运用开源的网站程序平台,通过国际互联网络等手段为会员或游客提供程序代码或者文章信息等服务。本网站有权在必要时修改服务条款,服务条款一旦发生变动,将会在重要页面上提示修改内容或通过其他形式告知会员。如果会员不同意所改动的内容,可以主动取消获得的网络服务。如果会员继续享用网络服务,则视为接受服务条款的变动。网站保留随时修改或中断服务而不需知照会员的权利。本站行使修改或中断服务的权利,不需对会员或第三方负责。

关闭