【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿，这里小编给大家分享一些，方便大家学习。
The computer is widely used in education，and some people think teachers do not play important roles in the classroom. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In this IT age, computers are widely used in the classroom in order to enrich the methods of teaching. This phenomenon gives some the illusion that the thing teaching students is no longer the teacher but a computer. Personally, I disagree with this opinion.
As another machines, computer doesnt enable to control itself. Though computers are capable of learning from their mistakes and improving on their performance, they need details instructions from human being in order to be able to operate. They can never, as it were lead independent lives, no mention teaching students. In case a computer lacks the control of a teacher, there is no difference between a computer and waste.
Not only this, but computers, unlike a teacher, cant solve a variety of new problems. Everything is developing in todays society, including education. For example, a student suddenly asks a creative question that the computer isnt programmed for, it can do nothing, while teacher can explain clearly though abundant teaching experience.
Last but not least, the computer cant communicate with students from emotion. Such as an eyesight or gesture of teacher can transfer his or her idea and feeling to students. In this way, students can feel more human touch in the class. In comparison, the computer is too dry and dusty to understand.
All in all, no matter how nice a computer is, it cant take the place of teacher. Of course, I dont mean that computer is useless. In contrary, I believe it will become the most powerful assistants to teacher in further.
The computer is widely used in education，and some people think teachers do not play important roles in the classroom. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In this IT age, computers are widely used in the classroom in order to enrich the methods of teaching. This phenomenon gives some the illusion that the thing teaching students is no longer the teacher but a computer. Personally, I disagree with this opinion.
As another machines, computer doesnt enable to control itself. Though computers are capable of learning from their mistakes and improving on their performance, they need details instructions from human being in order to be able to operate. They can never, as it were lead independent lives, no mention teaching students. In case a computer lacks the control of a teacher, there is no difference between a computer and waste.
Not only this, but computers, unlike a teacher, cant solve a variety of new problems. Everything is developing in todays society, including education. For example, a student suddenly asks a creative question that the computer isnt programmed for, it can do nothing, while teacher can explain clearly though abundant teaching experience.
Last but not least, the computer cant communicate with students from emotion. Such as an eyesight or gesture of teacher can transfer his or her idea and feeling to students. In this way, students can feel more human touch in the class. In comparison, the computer is too dry and dusty to understand.
All in all, no matter how nice a computer is, it cant take the place of teacher. Of course, I dont mean that computer is useless. In contrary, I believe it will become the most powerful assistants to teacher in further.
