【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿，这里小编给大家分享一些，方便大家学习。
gre改革后新版gre写作新题库里的作文方面的一个重要变化是有了指导语。而指导语的作用是有助于我们的逻辑性写作，以下是新版gre写作新题库内有关argument168的写作部分：
题目：
The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper.
The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the citys limited budget. However, at some of our recent meetings we failed to make important decisions because of the foolish objections raised by committee members who are not even residents of Oak City. People who work in Oak City but who live elsewhere cannot fully understand the business and politics of the city. After all, only Oak City residents pay city taxes, and therefore only residents understand how that money could best be used to improve the city. We recommend, then, that the Committee for a Better Oak City vote to restrict its membership to city residents only. We predict that, without the interference of non-residents, the committee will be able to make Oak City a better place in which to live and work.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻译：
O城市改善委员会的主要责任就是在如果更好使用有限的预算方面给予其建议。但是，在最近的会议上我们没有做出任何的重要的决定，是因为在会议上一些并非O市民的委员们提出的愚蠢的反对意见。那些只在O工作而不居住的人是根本不可能完全了解这里的政治和经济的。总而言之，只有O的市民缴税，因此只有他们才知道如何使用这笔钱更好的改善本市。所以我们的建议是城市改善委员会的委员们只有O市市民才可以投票。我们预计没有了外地人的干预，这个委员会会使我们O市变成更适宜工作和居住的城市。
写一篇回应，在其中讨论还有哪些问题需要被回答才能决定文中的推荐是否能得到预期结果，并务请解释对这些问题的回答是如何帮助更好的评估文中的建议的。
此上就是新版gre写作新题库 argument168的内容从今天起小编就给大家连续提供新版gre写作新题库argument部分的内容。希望大家能够在练习中提高自己的写作水平。
gre改革后新版gre写作新题库里的作文方面的一个重要变化是有了指导语。而指导语的作用是有助于我们的逻辑性写作，以下是新版gre写作新题库内有关argument168的写作部分：
题目：
The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper.
The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the citys limited budget. However, at some of our recent meetings we failed to make important decisions because of the foolish objections raised by committee members who are not even residents of Oak City. People who work in Oak City but who live elsewhere cannot fully understand the business and politics of the city. After all, only Oak City residents pay city taxes, and therefore only residents understand how that money could best be used to improve the city. We recommend, then, that the Committee for a Better Oak City vote to restrict its membership to city residents only. We predict that, without the interference of non-residents, the committee will be able to make Oak City a better place in which to live and work.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻译：
O城市改善委员会的主要责任就是在如果更好使用有限的预算方面给予其建议。但是，在最近的会议上我们没有做出任何的重要的决定，是因为在会议上一些并非O市民的委员们提出的愚蠢的反对意见。那些只在O工作而不居住的人是根本不可能完全了解这里的政治和经济的。总而言之，只有O的市民缴税，因此只有他们才知道如何使用这笔钱更好的改善本市。所以我们的建议是城市改善委员会的委员们只有O市市民才可以投票。我们预计没有了外地人的干预，这个委员会会使我们O市变成更适宜工作和居住的城市。
写一篇回应，在其中讨论还有哪些问题需要被回答才能决定文中的推荐是否能得到预期结果，并务请解释对这些问题的回答是如何帮助更好的评估文中的建议的。
此上就是新版gre写作新题库 argument168的内容从今天起小编就给大家连续提供新版gre写作新题库argument部分的内容。希望大家能够在练习中提高自己的写作水平。
