【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿,这里小编给大家分享一些,方便大家学习。
8 、It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
部分同意
1、承认为了获得政治领导权 win the political game需要withhold informaion to gain political power; disclose every personal flaw, shortcoming, foibles opponents will take advantage; no need to be complete honest
2、关系到 classic information of the government要保留 national defence,attack on drug dealers
3、但在关系到人民利益的时候隐瞒信息会对人们造成危害,使政府失去信任 the panic caused by SARS derived from China in 2003 was mostly initia ted by the closure of information by the government of Beijing. Lots of citizens are not available to take measures to protect from this deadly disease.
It is always impossible for the political leaders to reveal everything to the public, especially some the information which can affect the national security. Different nations are competing and even antagonistic. Revealing some information could has no help for the solution but poses negative impact on the stability of a country. Unidentified illness
Withholding information should not be the excuse for political leaders to abuse their power.
Withholding information at their will could provide the chance of corruption, 在不威胁国家安全,社会稳定情况下,政府行为应该尽可能透明,接受监督。
【题目】 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
【翻译】对于政治领导者来说,向人民大众隐瞒信息通常是必要的,甚至有益的。少数和多数的关系之 true lies, the truth is out there.
【提纲】
1、向人民大众隐瞒一些信息在一些情况下是有必要的,甚至是有宜的,例子,政府准备到某个 state 进行人们生活质量的考察,之前就很有必要不要告诉大家,因为如果告诉了 the public ,那么那个state 的领导可能会做一些表明工作,那么考察到的就不是真实情况了【这是看的别人的例子,实在没想出来】
2、在一些情况下告诉 the public 实情还能帮助政府度过危机【例子就是 SARS 在2002 年在中国,如果不告知民众,那么很有可能大家不知道如何预防这种 virus,使得更多的人染上它,但告知后,人民在政府的领导下,降低了感染上这种 virus 的人数,成功的控制了 virus】
3、总结
领导对公众有所保留
一、适当的保留是必须的,无论是上台前还是上台后 imcompatible 。但长期不行。
二、在上台前,诚实是无用的美德 Before the political leader is elected, honesty is not a useful virtue for candidates
1.民众不信任,给对手留空隙
2.没办法完全保证承诺能实现,布什的减税计划因 911 而没实现
三、上台后有时隐瞒信息也是必要的。After being elected, it is advantaged to conceal some information for the leader either.
1.国家安全,国家安全会议
2.经济利益,海带丰收
3.公众容易恐慌,禽流感传闻
四、on the other hand, people in any democracy will throw down the gauntlet to the goverments blackout, or put it bluntly, so-called fooling the public, in the long run.
1、民主社会,人民才是主人
2、 empirical evidence of economy,持续通胀 counterproductive
3、长期欺骗只有 downfall, abuse, subversi on of administration
8T 个体和整体 政治类 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. 8 . 政治领导们在公众面前有所保留是必要的,甚至是必须的。
① 在某些情况下,封闭信息是需要。A 如国防 national defense,抓捕犯人 culprit等B 有时群众了解的信息可能是片面的,引起骚动,还不如不了解 Admittedly, sometimes it is necessary for political leaders to keep the public from know something, such as countrys top secret, which is indispensable and helpful for a country in defending aggression and keeping safety.
② 公开信息更有利于群众与政府的互动,更利于帮助政府把事情办好. 如:现在很多地方的政府网站,以及摄像头等。
③ 公开信息还有一个优势:防止权力的腐败 反面说:引起腐败,and therefore bring detriment to society.
Firstly, political leaders, in a democracy regime, will harm the proper right of people as they withhold information from the public.
Secondly, withholding information from the public will result in corruption in the government, and therefore bring detriment to society.
8 、It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
部分同意
1、承认为了获得政治领导权 win the political game需要withhold informaion to gain political power; disclose every personal flaw, shortcoming, foibles opponents will take advantage; no need to be complete honest
2、关系到 classic information of the government要保留 national defence,attack on drug dealers
3、但在关系到人民利益的时候隐瞒信息会对人们造成危害,使政府失去信任 the panic caused by SARS derived from China in 2003 was mostly initia ted by the closure of information by the government of Beijing. Lots of citizens are not available to take measures to protect from this deadly disease.
It is always impossible for the political leaders to reveal everything to the public, especially some the information which can affect the national security. Different nations are competing and even antagonistic. Revealing some information could has no help for the solution but poses negative impact on the stability of a country. Unidentified illness
Withholding information should not be the excuse for political leaders to abuse their power.
Withholding information at their will could provide the chance of corruption, 在不威胁国家安全,社会稳定情况下,政府行为应该尽可能透明,接受监督。
【题目】 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
【翻译】对于政治领导者来说,向人民大众隐瞒信息通常是必要的,甚至有益的。少数和多数的关系之 true lies, the truth is out there.
【提纲】
1、向人民大众隐瞒一些信息在一些情况下是有必要的,甚至是有宜的,例子,政府准备到某个 state 进行人们生活质量的考察,之前就很有必要不要告诉大家,因为如果告诉了 the public ,那么那个state 的领导可能会做一些表明工作,那么考察到的就不是真实情况了【这是看的别人的例子,实在没想出来】
2、在一些情况下告诉 the public 实情还能帮助政府度过危机【例子就是 SARS 在2002 年在中国,如果不告知民众,那么很有可能大家不知道如何预防这种 virus,使得更多的人染上它,但告知后,人民在政府的领导下,降低了感染上这种 virus 的人数,成功的控制了 virus】
3、总结
领导对公众有所保留
一、适当的保留是必须的,无论是上台前还是上台后 imcompatible 。但长期不行。
二、在上台前,诚实是无用的美德 Before the political leader is elected, honesty is not a useful virtue for candidates
1.民众不信任,给对手留空隙
2.没办法完全保证承诺能实现,布什的减税计划因 911 而没实现
三、上台后有时隐瞒信息也是必要的。After being elected, it is advantaged to conceal some information for the leader either.
1.国家安全,国家安全会议
2.经济利益,海带丰收
3.公众容易恐慌,禽流感传闻
四、on the other hand, people in any democracy will throw down the gauntlet to the goverments blackout, or put it bluntly, so-called fooling the public, in the long run.
1、民主社会,人民才是主人
2、 empirical evidence of economy,持续通胀 counterproductive
3、长期欺骗只有 downfall, abuse, subversi on of administration
8T 个体和整体 政治类 It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. 8 . 政治领导们在公众面前有所保留是必要的,甚至是必须的。
① 在某些情况下,封闭信息是需要。A 如国防 national defense,抓捕犯人 culprit等B 有时群众了解的信息可能是片面的,引起骚动,还不如不了解 Admittedly, sometimes it is necessary for political leaders to keep the public from know something, such as countrys top secret, which is indispensable and helpful for a country in defending aggression and keeping safety.
② 公开信息更有利于群众与政府的互动,更利于帮助政府把事情办好. 如:现在很多地方的政府网站,以及摄像头等。
③ 公开信息还有一个优势:防止权力的腐败 反面说:引起腐败,and therefore bring detriment to society.
Firstly, political leaders, in a democracy regime, will harm the proper right of people as they withhold information from the public.
Secondly, withholding information from the public will result in corruption in the government, and therefore bring detriment to society.