【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿，这里小编给大家分享一些，方便大家学习。
小作文：两个线图，第一个the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009. 第二个percentage of running train on time and target from 2000 to 2009.
答题要点：动态图重点写趋势;结论写两个图的联系。
大作文：
The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world spends numerous government expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
During the process of urbanization, governments in different countries show different attitudes towards their historic buildings. In China, a large quantity of old fashioned houses and sites such as siheyuan and the ancient rampart have been demolished to give way to modern high rises. (被动句)
The new modern buildings of course look much more glamorous and functionbetter than old ones. Modern architectural techniques give modern buildings advantages in terms of spatial and material efficiency of use at attempt toaccommodate increasing population in crowded metropolis. Meanwhile substantial infrastructures including new roads are also in need due to the fast progress ofinter-province trade and business. There is also an economic factor regarding this practice. Constructing new buildings consumes more materials, which canboost related industries such as steel, iron, lumber, cement and so forth. (比较级，非谓语，there be句型，动名词做主语，定语从句)
However, the above reasons cannot justify tearing down old buildings, especially historic ones which represent local unique history and culture. In addition, residents living in these old buildings can still hold their traditional life style. So it is not exaggerating to say that living in an old building is like living in a museum. It is true that renovation of old buildings costs government money. However, heritage is worth of such expenditure because keeping those buildings as they were many years ago allows local people from generation to generation to better understand their history and culture and share their values and traditions. Such common in values and traditions means significant for a nation to be strong and integrated. Therefore it is worthwhile for the government to make such investment. (动名词做宾语，定语从句，非谓语，形式主语，原因状语从句，动名词，方式状语从句)
Based on the analysis above, it would be safe to arrive at this conclusionthat although conservation of old architectures and sites cost a lot, such practice gets rewards in terms of cultural transmission and national integration. (形式主语，同位语从句)
小作文：两个线图，第一个the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009. 第二个percentage of running train on time and target from 2000 to 2009.
答题要点：动态图重点写趋势;结论写两个图的联系。
大作文：
The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world spends numerous government expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
During the process of urbanization, governments in different countries show different attitudes towards their historic buildings. In China, a large quantity of old fashioned houses and sites such as siheyuan and the ancient rampart have been demolished to give way to modern high rises. (被动句)
The new modern buildings of course look much more glamorous and functionbetter than old ones. Modern architectural techniques give modern buildings advantages in terms of spatial and material efficiency of use at attempt toaccommodate increasing population in crowded metropolis. Meanwhile substantial infrastructures including new roads are also in need due to the fast progress ofinter-province trade and business. There is also an economic factor regarding this practice. Constructing new buildings consumes more materials, which canboost related industries such as steel, iron, lumber, cement and so forth. (比较级，非谓语，there be句型，动名词做主语，定语从句)
However, the above reasons cannot justify tearing down old buildings, especially historic ones which represent local unique history and culture. In addition, residents living in these old buildings can still hold their traditional life style. So it is not exaggerating to say that living in an old building is like living in a museum. It is true that renovation of old buildings costs government money. However, heritage is worth of such expenditure because keeping those buildings as they were many years ago allows local people from generation to generation to better understand their history and culture and share their values and traditions. Such common in values and traditions means significant for a nation to be strong and integrated. Therefore it is worthwhile for the government to make such investment. (动名词做宾语，定语从句，非谓语，形式主语，原因状语从句，动名词，方式状语从句)
Based on the analysis above, it would be safe to arrive at this conclusionthat although conservation of old architectures and sites cost a lot, such practice gets rewards in terms of cultural transmission and national integration. (形式主语，同位语从句)
